EL ORÅCULO DEL SAN GENNARO

† † †
SUMMON ST. JANUARIUS Mustfinish at gmail dot lol

Today I was making french toast in the kitchen and Roby hollered so I looked out the window and saw the biggest bird I’ve ever seen circling the graveyard across 41st street.

This week it finally clicked for me: the stock market isn’t tanking because of some arcane financial details that we don’t understand, it’s tanking because we finally DO understand.

We understand that debt is as toxic to the collective as it is to the individual.  We understand that the bailout is useless to us if it doesn’t increase confidence in high finance and their status quo.  We understand that there’s no reason to be confident in clever rats who make billions for themselves by poisoning their own business— indeed, their own economy.  We understand how money is conjured up in a fractional reserve system.  We understand what the mounting debt means to our future earnings.  We understand that hanging a few fallguys out to dry doesn’t even begin to address the culture that is so smugly assured that it’s in everyone’s best interest for the richest, hoardingest, most money-obsessed segment of our society to get richer and richer and never stop getting richer.  We understand how much energy has been spent on inventing complicated new ways to manipulate theoretical money and projected earnings, and how generously these people have rewarded themselves for it.  We understand that no one was expected to use their personal bonuses or ludicrous salaries to help these businesses survive.  We understand who mails us these credit card offers and the effect they expected the cards to have on our lives.  We understand what kind of person demands that perpetual, limitless growth is not only possible, but imperative.  We understand exactly what will happen if we stop beleiving in the mysterious power of their paper assets and refuse to let them gamble with our earnings any longer.

We have stories, stories thousands of years old, some of which have persevered through upheaval and migration and collapse and revolution.  Stories about Midas, about Croesus, about Scrooge, about Gordon Gekko.  We don’t fool ourselves into thinking that times are so different now, not like we grew up doing.  It’s not so easy to pretend now that internet and HDTV and cellphone and eyepod are proof that modern Americans have outgrown the old caveats, have outfoxed the old rules like “what goes up, must come down” and “don’t be a greedy shithead.”

The upper class might fear the crash, but I think the sharper ones amongst them have known for a minute it was coming: they’ve obviously taken steps to insulate themselves, to shake as much money from the tree before winter really hits and it gets chopped up for firewood.  These people, I’m sure, are already brainstorming ways to bring even more wealth into their possesion during the chaos to come.  The middle class is maybe scared, but they’re always scared of something, always convinced they’re just one wrong move away from losing it all…

The working class—you know, the secret people that neither presidential candidate has to mention?— well we can’t hardly wait.  There’s a shitload of us, too.  More than there are aspiring CEOs, more than there are office hacks surfing the web, more than there are hung-over college students.  More than there are cops, I’d wager, if I was interested in making wagers at this hour.

Short of rolling a guillotine through Manhattan and offfering us a grand pyramid made entirely of rich men’s heads, there will not be any more confidence in our present financial arrangement.  Ever.  This crash is inevitable, and necessary, and welcomed.

My advice to the anxious is to follow Roby’s lead and learn how to make wine, beer, mead, spirits, etc.  You’ll be flush with friends and good stuff to barter.  In the land of Joe Sixpack, the distiller can’t help but do fine through tough times.

If we must stop aggregate growth because it is uneconomic, then how do we deal with poverty in the SSE? The simple answer is by redistribution—by limits to the range of permissible inequality, by a minimum income and a maximum income. What is the proper range of inequality—one that rewards real differences and contributions rather than just multiplying privilege? Plato thought it was a factor of four. Universities, civil services and the military seem to manage with a factor of ten to twenty. In the US corporate sector it is over 500. As a first step could we not try to lower the overall range to a factor of, say, one hundred? Remember, we are no longer trying to provide massive incentives to stimulate (uneconomic) growth! Also, since we are not trying to stimulate aggregate growth, we no longer need to spend billions on advertising. Instead of treating advertising as a tax-deductible cost of production we should tax it heavily as a public nuisance. If economists really believe that the consumer is sovereign then she should be obeyed rather than manipulated, cajoled, badgered, and lied to. Herman Daly, here

UPDATE

No cell phone for quite a few weeks now and I miss it not one bit.  Got a nice and heavy old brown phone off ebay and Roby found a little microcassette answering machine at the Salvation Army on Greenmount, and I find I’m paying much more attention to the people I talk to on the phone now, though still working on getting the new number out to all the people who might want to call me one day…

We get a lot of wrong numbers, though.  Not just regular wrong numbers— we get at least one call almost every day from somebody who wants us to open the door and let them in.  At first I just told them all it was a wrong number and quickly excused myself.  But more and more the callers would try to explain: “I’m just out front, can you just open the door for me?”  So I’ve been getting more and more patient about explaining my inability to open the door.

I’ve thought a lot about the door they must be standing in front of… where is it? Is any part of it glass?  And so there must be an old sign on the door with our number on it, right?  I wonder if it’s hand-written… When I walk to my job I pass two different houses that have permanent sharpie-on-unlined-8.5x11 signs taped to the door with instructions for deliveries, and when I think of the sign in front of the building I don’t know how to let anyone into, I think of a yellower version of one of those signs.

The connection is always really noisy when these people call— you can tell right away it’s not anyone we know from the immediate street noise and the extra-distant sound of the caller’s voice.  I used to think this was because they were using some kind of intercom that was mounted on the building, near the yellow sign, but then I got to thinking that there’s probably not an intercom that can just dial up a regular phone number.

We got a message on the answering machine yesterday, however, that has completely changed my thinking about the locked door and the building it leads into.  The message starts with the same kind of noisy, busy-street sounds.  Then a man’s voice says:

“How ya doin?

There’s a bit of a pause.  Then, same voice:

“Are you alright?”

then a second voice, possibly a woman:

“What year is it?”

and the first voice answers:

“86.”

So It would appear that the inaccessible building is not only located somewhere else in the city, it also seems located at a different point in time.  It could explain the intercom-like quality: those ancient coin-operated “pay-phones” that used to dot the urban landscape.  I will update this site with any further developments.  Also, sorry for having a kind of anything-goes Sir-linksalot blahg here.  Things are gonna shape up around these parts.

The notion of interest, when it was first introduced, was considered diabolical by all three major Western religions: Islam, Judaism and Christianity. They understood that making money without doing any work or undertaking any risk could only lead to no good. They may have also understood that in a finite world, nothing can grow forever except cancer. Jenna Orkin on FTW2
While speculators enjoy the economy of scale, we inhabit an ecology scaled to the human being that was lost in the corporatist equation. Douglas Rushkoff

RIP DFW

The difference between the fantasy of sudden collapse and the reality of one more localized jolt piling additional burdens on a stumbling society is well worth keeping in mind. Like the proverbial frog in the saucepan, those who think of apocalyptic collapse as the only way industrial civilization can break down are far less likely to notice the gradual changes in their environment that are leading in the same direction, just more slowly. It’s as though, to shift stories, the boy who cried wolf was convinced that immense armies of wolves would suddenly swoop down and eat up all the sheep in the world at once, and mistook every whistle of wind in the trees for the distant howling of the wolf pack to end all wolf packs; meanwhile, practically under his nose, real wolves – scruffy, undersized, and quite depressingly few in number compared to the massed uber-wolves of the fantasy – were picking off a sheep or two each day from the fringes of the flock. The Archdruid Report 9-3-08
Since the D’s don’t dare talk about Peak, they are on the defensive, allowing the R’s to set the agenda rather than admit that the days of “more” are ending… All of the “alternatives” are less energy dense, airplanes don’t run on solar panels, and a renewable energy society would be a decentralized, much less consumptive way of living. Most people who think our alleged “addiction” to oil is a bad thing have a very difficult time understanding any of this. Surely some smart Einstein type mad scientist will perform a “deus ex machina” … the sad truth is we live in a world of cargo cults. OILEMPIRE.US (wiki “cargo cults” if you’re unfamiliar)